SORRY – undecided. Somebody pointed out on the radio today that David Cameron had mentioned his target group, The Great Ignored, only once, on the very first day of his campaign. An adviser had presumably reminded him that it was too reminiscent of The Great Unwashed, a term coined in the mid 19th-Century to describe the so-called ‘lower classes.’ Personally, I wish he’d stuck to his theme: it finds an echo in my lonely heart. Deep in a safe Tory constituency – William Hague’s – I can’t kid myself that my vote is vital, but it would have been nice to have somebody at least knock on the door and ask my intentions (or even my opinions – I’ve got loads of those). I’ve never been collared in the street by a pollster, much less a politician. Unless you count the time David Cameron stopped to pat Harry on the head in Eynsham. ‘What a smart little dog. Must be a Tory,’ he commented. Ian rather tetchily drew his attention to Harry’s red lead and Harry said he was nobody’s patsy and would make up his own mind, thank you very much.

Likewise his mistress. But I’m leaning to the Lib Dems. I don’t think anybody has the answer to the massive economic catastrophe – certainly not the bunch of incompetents who’ve caused it – and in truth I can see little ideological difference between the parties. The arguments seem to be entirely about not if (that’s a given) but when the cuts will come. Watching the violent demonstrations in Athens because of the austerity measures the government there has put in place, brings little comfort. Could it happen here? You bet.

So, though I still haven’t finally made up my mind and have little faith in any of them to make a positive difference to our lives, I look at just two Lib Dem policies: voting reform, and the so-called amnesty for illegal immigrants. Nick Clegg’s argument on the latter is subtle, clever and intelligent. It’s been deliberately misrepresented by opponents, and latched onto by the right-wing press to discredit him. But he’s had the guts to put it on the agenda, knowing it could so easily be misconstrued, and that takes courage and integrity, both in short supply among politicians these days.

Roll on Thursday. Harry can’t wait . . .



  1. Well what can I say? The trouble with the Broads is that you can’t see over the bank in most places. You would have been much better going on the canals, especially the Caldon where it runs beside a Real Steam Railway line and you can moor up outside a pub that serves excellent food and Real Ale! But then that maybe too much when he really should have taken you on that cruise!
    I’ll not comment on our new government as the jury is still out. I might not have a job if they cut many more civil servants!

    1. You’re right about the Broads. Though the skies were spectacular. A canal boat might have been a better option but the fact is that tootling around on narrow stretches of water is just a bit – how shall I put this? – restricting. I need a bit more excitement! I agree the jury’s out on the new government but it’s certainly returned a verdict on the old one: guilty as charged. Of just about everything, if you ask me. But Ian doesn’t. He just keeps doggedly buying his Guardian – and reading my Telegraph!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s